{"id":8863,"date":"2026-06-26T07:07:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-26T12:07:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.mhisolutionsmag.com\/?p=8863"},"modified":"2026-06-26T05:28:58","modified_gmt":"2026-06-26T10:28:58","slug":"reshaping-fulfillment-networks-for-2026-and-beyond","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mhisolutionsmag.com\/index.php\/2026\/06\/26\/reshaping-fulfillment-networks-for-2026-and-beyond\/","title":{"rendered":"Reshaping Fulfillment Networks\u2014 for 2026 and Beyond"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Fulfillment networks are steadily evolving in three noticeable ways.<\/h3>\n
<\/div>\n
BY CHRIS LEWIS<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\"reshaping
ISTOCK.COM<\/a>\/ARTEMISDIANA<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

M<\/span>AKE NO MISTAKE<\/strong> about it. When it comes to micro\u2011fulfillment and omnichannel strategies, a variety of shifts are occurring. In fact, many\u2014if not most\u2014of these shifts will continue well beyond 2026.<\/p>\n

Why? Simply put, companies are striving to meet their customers\u2019 ever\u2011rising expectations. Yet, at the same time, they\u2019re often determined to do so without increasing their labor proportionately.<\/p>\n

With this in mind, automation, AI, data analytics, real\u2011time inventory accuracy and reverse logistics aren\u2019t just additions for supply chains anymore. They\u2019re absolutely necessary capabilities. After all, they\u2019ll help companies achieve two primary goals simultaneously: diminishing their manual workloads and enhancing their efficiency.<\/p>\n

In preparation for these shifts, five logistics experts shared their insights about the evolution of fulfillment\u2011network architecture\u2014from fulfillment node redistribution, to real\u2011time inventory accuracy, to reverse logistics loops.<\/p>\n

REDISTRIBUTION = HIGHER EFFICIENCY<\/h4>\n

As Kevin Graebel reflects on recent trends, he believes fulfillment nodes are currently being redistributed according to customers\u2019 service expectations and demand patterns, rather than transportation efficiency alone. In particular, companies are moving their inventory so that they\u2019re closer to their customers via hybrid, store\u2011based fulfillment, micro\u2011fulfillment centers and regional locations.<\/p>\n

Additionally, every single node isn\u2019t designed to do everything anymore. Instead, networks now consist of specialized nodes. Each of these nodes has been optimized for certain roles, too, from returns processing to storage density and throughput.<\/p>\n

“This redistribution requires strong system\u2011level coordination because inventory and order flow decisions now span multiple locations in real time,” said Graebel, chief product officer at MHI member Honeywell Intelligrated.<\/p>\n

At the same time, nodes are increasingly being embedded within retail stores\u2019 existing infrastructures. As this embedding occurs, retail stores are being retrofitted with dark fulfillment zones. According to Josh Lett, vice president of customer experience at MHI member Deposco, ship\u2011from\u2011store operations are no longer “margin\u2011dilutive workarounds.” Instead, they\u2019re “legitimate network strategies,” especially for omnichannel retailers who already have the geographic reach they need but are seeking software for reliable execution.<\/p>\n

Lett said that nodes are “being pushed upstream toward suppliers and manufacturers,” too. Consequently, vendors who can either fulfill direct\u2011to\u2011consumer or direct\u2011to\u2011store orders (or both) are the most reliable network assets now.<\/p>\n

“The brands doing this well are extending their warehouse management system (WMS) logic into their supplier relationships, creating what amounts to a virtual, extended fulfillment network,” Lett said.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, Dr. Eva Ponce, director of the MIT Omnichannel Supply Chain Lab at the MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics, has noticed a clear shift regarding fulfillment node redistribution. Centralized fulfillment networks are less common, as they\u2019re being replaced by architectures that are concurrently multi\u2011mode and more distributed. In agreement with Graebel\u2019s sentiment, Dr. Ponce has noticed companies are adding more nodes closer to their customers. While doing so, they\u2019re also maintaining larger fulfillment centers that are more automated and efficient.<\/p>\n

“In practice, inventory is no longer concentrated in a few locations but pushed closer to the demand and distributed across the network,” Dr. Ponce said.<\/p>\n

To ensure that nodes are closer to customers, they\u2019re distributed “more intentionally” as well, according to Josh Hartman, vertical market strategy leader at MHI member Dematic. As a result, companies are considering how to combine centralized, full\u2011assortment facilities with smaller, strategically located metro or regional nodes.<\/p>\n

“In this structure, larger hubs handle bulk storage and high\u2011volume processing, while smaller nodes position fast\u2011moving inventory closer to demand,” Hartman said.<\/p>\n

By doing so, delivery speed increases, order fulfillment becomes more responsive and companies have more balanced networks “that can flex between centralized efficiency and localized responsiveness.”<\/p>\n

Aside from improving companies\u2019 delivery times, Landon Keatts, global key account manager at K\u00f6rber Supply Chain, said that fulfillment nodes are being repositioned to diminish last\u2011mile costs, too. In Keatts\u2019 opinion, the best option is densely populated areas with predictable order profiles and volumes. In turn, the risk for unintended, additional travel decreases.<\/p>\n

“By aligning node placement more closely with demand patterns, companies can improve service levels, while reducing transportation inefficiencies,” Keatts explained. “This redistribution also allows companies to better align inventory deployment with customer expectations, supporting faster fulfillment and more consistent delivery performance across channels.”<\/p>\n

AN ARCHITECTURAL REQUIREMENT<\/h4>\n

With regard to fulfillment\u2011network architecture, Keatts has noticed one major necessity: real\u2011time inventory accuracy. In fact, he thinks it\u2019s “foundational to modern fulfillment network design.” There are a myriad of reasons. First, inaccurate inventory data leads to misrouted orders, mismanaged labor and a reduction in network performance as a whole.<\/p>\n

“As fulfillment networks become more distributed, these inefficiencies multiply quickly,” he emphasized.<\/p>\n

Second, inaccurate inventory data negatively influences customers\u2019 experiences. If deliveries are delayed or missed, their trust will decline considerably, resulting in adverse effects, potentially long term. Thus, according to Keatts, real\u2011time visibility isn\u2019t just an operational requirement. It\u2019s a “critical component of maintaining service commitments” as well.<\/p>\n

Graebel agrees, adding that whenever inventory data is inaccurate, automation performance, labor efficiency and service promises are directly hindered. Therefore, he stresses that fulfillment networks must be designed with two goals in mind: continuous visibility and closed\u2011loop feedback. Such visibility and feedback must occur between automation systems, execution software and operators, too.<\/p>\n

“Inventory accuracy is no longer a reporting function at the end of a process,” Graebel said. “It\u2019s an active input that drives routing, replenishment and execution decisions throughout the network.”<\/p>\n

To further emphasize the significance of real\u2011time inventory accuracy, Lett describes it as “load\u2011bearing infrastructure.” In the past, it was simply a “nice\u2011to\u2011have.” He believes this substantial shift has occurred for several reasons. Whenever operators oversaw one distribution center for a single channel, inventory inaccuracy was just a “manageable nuisance.” But now that inventory is constantly being dispersed across numerous channels from a distributed node network? Inaccuracy is a “customer experience catastrophe” instead.<\/p>\n

While network complexity continues to rise, so does the potential negative impact of inaccuracy. This complexity is related to countless factors, including channels, handoffs and nodes.<\/p>\n

“Every additional node, channel and handoff in a supply chain is a place where inventory reality can diverge from inventory record,” Lett said.<\/p>\n